Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Rogal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) serial ^# 07:56, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Rogal

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. The article itself states "Rogal has performed mostly in supporting roles". The roles include even unnamed characters, such as Hooker, Prostitute, Bartender, and Papergirl. Source #1 is fine. Sources #2 and #3 are interviews, so not RS. Sources #4, #5, and #6 are mentions. There isn't enough here to justify a WP article. Kbabej (talk) 16:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Kbabej (talk) 16:03, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I was able to find some newspaper coverage that she got in her home state of Pennsylvania. 1, 2 Not familiar with her work, so won't be voting for now. GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 17:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a bunch of supporting roles does not notability make.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:00, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: This is, in my opinion, a borderline case. The sources identified above help make an argument for WP:GNG. As for WP:NACTOR, the subject's role in the play, Muckrakers, is significant, yet all other roles are supporting, at best. Therefore, I think a "Weak Keep" is the best I can do in the circumstances. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 02:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She has acted in almost 20 films, so for me she is notable. TheImaCow (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.